no more ads revenue? google keeps 90% now. here's what's left for us.

January 18, 2026 -- views • -- viewers

if you woke up january 14th to your rpm down 50-90%, you weren't alone.

google's own status page shows it started jan 13 at 6pm UTC and wasn't "resolved" until jan 15 at 9:57pm. that's 52 hours. their words: "systemic decline in Ad Exchange (AdX) match rates and delivery specifically impacting Google demand sources."

here's what that means in english: google's own advertisers stopped bidding on your inventory. for two days. globally.

germany down 64%. spain down 90%. US sites reporting 50-80% drops. they called it fixed. check your dashboard. is it back to normal?

didn't think so.

but here's the thing. january wasn't the problem. january was the symptom.

sad to know. my adsense went from $1.5k/month to $218 over the past year and i thought it was just me. bad content. wrong niche. not enough traffic. so i did what any reasonable person would do. i spent a week pulling data from alphabet earnings calls, cloudflare's 2025 report, and every forum thread i could find (well might not something every reasonable person would do, but I belong to that category, I guess).

turns out it's not me. it's not you either. the game changed and nobody sent us the memo.

the 90/10 split

google's network revenue (adsense, admob, ad manager) is now only 10% of their total ad revenue. first time ever. the other 90% goes to youtube, search, ai overviews.

jason kint called it out in august: "i've been watching google's ad revenue mix shift from network to owned properties for over a decade. it just hit 90%."

Image

look at that chart. 2013 we got 27%. every quarter since, it's been bleeding. slow enough that you don't notice until you check your year-over-year and wonder what happened.

you're not imagining things. it's structural.

the bot problem

this one took me down a rabbit hole.

cloudflare's 2025 year-in-review says ai crawling increased 15x this year. not 15%. fifteen times. and here's the part that made me close my laptop and go for a walk: some ai companies crawl your site 70,000 times for every 1 visitor they send back.

anthropic's crawl-to-refer ratio is 70,900:1. they're training on your content and sending you nothing.

that china traffic flooding your ga4? i dug into this. bots from lanzhou and singapore are triggering measurement calls without actually visiting your site. your pageviews go up. your CTR crashes. your rpm dies. and you sit there wondering why your "growing" site is making less money.

one publisher in the adsense forums said his rpm dropped 62% while cloudflare showed 6x more "traffic" than adsense counted. the math doesn't lie.

bots don't click ads. they just inflate your denominator.

january wasn't a bug

let me connect the dots.

publishers were already reporting 70-80% cumulative revenue declines since mid-2025. december's core update crushed traffic for content sites during what should've been the most lucrative month of the year. one guy reported christmas week down 85% from normal.

then january 14th hit and everyone noticed at once. but the crash didn't start in january. january just made it visible to people who weren't paying attention.

google called it a technical issue. maybe it was. but when your "fix" doesn't restore revenue to pre-crash levels, that's not a bug. that's a new baseline.

image.png

ai content gets rejected

found a documented case while researching. site with 700+ articles applied for adsense. rejected. owner ran the top 10 articles through an ai detector. 7 came back as 100% ai-generated.

they removed those articles. reapplied. immediately approved.

google can detect ai content. they're using it in approval decisions. they're just not telling anyone publicly. something to keep in mind if you're scaling with chatgpt and wondering why your approval keeps getting denied.

what the high-rpm publishers are actually doing

i spent time analyzing publishers who are still hitting $50+ rpm. wanted to understand what separates them from the rest of us.

three patterns kept showing up:

1. aggressive bot filtering. not just the obvious stuff. they're blocking ahrefs crawlers, semrush bots, entire chinese ip ranges. these crawlers create impressions without clicks. every fake impression tanks your CTR, and low CTR means lower bids from advertisers. one guy said blocking seo tool crawlers alone improved his rpm by 15%.

2. traffic source matters more than traffic volume. same site, same content, wildly different rpm by country:

  • netherlands: $143

  • germany: $99

  • UK: $95

  • USA: $69

  • brazil: $9

that's not a typo. netherlands is paying 15x what brazil pays. if you're optimizing for raw pageviews without looking at where they come from, you're leaving money on the table.

3. quality over scale. found a publisher making $1,350/month on 27,000 pageviews. that's $50 rpm. meanwhile there are sites with 500k pageviews making less because they're chasing volume with low-intent content.

the formula isn't more traffic. it's better traffic + fewer bots + commercial intent.

what actually works now

i'll save you the trial and error i went through.

stop chasing pageviews. advertisers pay for intent. "how to code a for loop" attracts people who will never buy anything. "best crm for construction companies 2026" attracts people with budgets. guess which one gets $50 cpm.

block bot traffic aggressively. cloudflare free tier is a start. block chinese ip ranges. block ai scrapers that take your content and send nothing back. your analytics will look worse. your revenue will look better.

diversify now. not eventually. now. google is actively moving advertiser spend to owned properties. the deal they made with publishers twenty years ago is being unwound quarter by quarter. if adsense is your only revenue stream, you're building on sand.

the uncomfortable part

ai overviews show zero ads while using your content to answer queries. think about that.

you write the article. google crawls it. their ai summarizes it. user gets the answer without clicking. google keeps 100% of whatever they eventually monetize that interaction for.

old deal: we crawl you, send traffic, you make money. new deal: we crawl you, answer it ourselves, thanks for the training data.

the 90/10 split isn't the end state. it's the trajectory.

#CaseStudy #Research

Respect
--

unpopular take: i think we're mourning a deal that was already dead.

everyone's panicking about the 90/10 split like google just betrayed us. but google didn't betray anyone. they just stopped pretending the old arrangement was permanent.

i've been quietly tracking publishers who are up since october. not surviving. up. and the pattern is uncomfortable for most people to hear.

example one: a guy who runs a sourdough blog. 47,000 email subscribers built over six years. his google traffic got cut in half after the december update. his revenue went up 23%. why? he sells a $29 "starter kit" PDF directly. no ads. no middleman. when i asked him about the traffic drop, he said "i stopped checking search console in november. waste of time."

example two: german finance blogger. she noticed her US traffic paid $12 rpm while her german traffic paid $89. same content, translated. she killed her english site entirely. doubled down on german. runs geo-targeted pinterest ads only to DACH countries. makes more money with 60% less traffic than she had in 2024.

example three: guy in the home automation niche. built a discord server three years ago "just for fun." 4,200 members now. when his adsense crashed in january, he posted a $199/year "premium support" tier. 340 people signed up in the first week. that's $67,000 ARR from a discord server he almost shut down twice.

none of these people are "beating the algorithm." they stopped playing that game entirely.

here's what i keep telling clients who ask me how to recover their rpm:

you're asking the wrong question.

the right question is: if google sent you zero traffic tomorrow, would your business survive?

if the answer is no, your rpm isn't your problem. your dependency is.

the data in techwizardrino's post is accurate. the 90/10 split is real. the bot inflation is real. january wasn't a bug.

but the lesson isn't "adsense is dying."

the lesson is: adsense was never the business. it was a subsidy. and subsidies end.

"in the himalayas, when the fixed ropes get pulled, the climbers who panic are the ones who never learned to climb without them."

what's actually working for people here? not "diversify" - specific moves. i'm collecting case studies.

Respect
--

just made an account to say this because i genuinely thought i was going crazy.

I run a tech troubleshooting blog. windows fixes, driver issues, printer nightmares. nothing fancy but it paid bills for three years.

here's my november vs january...

GA4 sessions: up 34%

adsense pageviews: up 12%

adsense rpm: down 58%

actual earnings: down 51%

I spent two weeks thinking i got hit by a penalty. ran screaming frog. Checked search console for manual actions. rebuilt my entire ads.txt. nothing.

Then i compared cloudflare analytics against GA4.

cloudflare showed 40% of my "traffic" wasn't even loading the page fully. Just hitting the measurement endpoint and bouncing. almost all of it from AS4134 (chinanet) and a few singapore ranges.

these aren't users. they're not even good bots. they're just noise. and that noise is destroying my CTR because google sees "impressions" that no human ever saw.

the 70,000:1 crawl ratio in this post makes sense now. they're not sending traffic. they're harvesting. we're just the field.

started blocking CN and SG at cloudflare level three days ago. too early to tell if rpm recovers but at least my GA4 finally matches reality. which is honestly a relief even if reality is smaller.

question for anyone doing this longer, is there a maintained list of ASNs to block? or just country-level? i don't want to nuke legitimate visitors but for my niche i'm not sure there are any from those regions anyway.

btw glad i found this place. found this post in reddit, been refreshing reddit threads for weeks and it's just "yeah me too" energy with no actual answers. this is the first breakdown with real sources i've seen.

Respect
--

The 90/10 curve does not take into account the growth of Googles total ad revenue though.

According to this source:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/266249/advertising-revenue-of-google/

Googles ad revenue grew from 51 billions to 265 billions in the period mentioned in the article. 27% of 51 billions is considerably less than 10% of 265 billions. So Googles ad market for publishers seems to have grown in the period, only less than Youtube and other sources.

If you struggle with your RPM, you should ask yourself why your ad units are not attractive for advertisers. The prices are determined by auction, not by Google.

Respect
--

Googles ad revenue grew from 51 billions to 265 billions in the period mentioned in the article.

image.png

thanks for sharing this, but does this mean the publishers are also gaining fair share of it?

Respect
--
End of thread

Search

Posts Tags Apps

Start typing to search across everything

Navigate Open Esc Close