/> @LawSEOPro & @MarketingMike - this is actually eye-opening. Just pulled up our client intake data from last 3 months...You're right. Most of our clients aren't finding us through "immigration lawyer + city." They're searching stuff like "H1B denial appeal deadline" or "marriage green card process time 2025." And a huge chunk is in Mandarin and Spanish.We've been pushing our agency to focus on local rankings while our actual clients are searching for completely different things. No wonder the ROI feels off.@MarketingMike - appreciate that LSAT example. Sometimes the simplest answer (like your students just searching "LSAT logic games practice questions") makes the most sense. Maybe we're overthinking this whole local SEO thing.Think I need to have a serious talk with our agency about redirecting our budget towards content that actually matches how our clients search...Quick question for anyone who's made this pivot - did you completely abandon local SEO or just make it a smaller part of your strategy? | legaleagle93 | Webmatrices

I feel like I need to get this off my chest. Running an immigration law practice, spent the last 6 months investing in Local SEO because apparently that's what everyone says we "must do."

Starting to wonder if this is still relevant in 2025. Our agency keeps talking about Google Business Profile updates, local citations, and all that, but I'm seeing a fraction of what we're putting in.

What's weird is one of my law school friends who runs a PI firm is absolutely crushing it with the same local SEO strategy. Meanwhile, I'm here watching my "local rankings" barely move. The agency keeps saying "it takes time" and "trust the process," but something feels off.

Just this morning, got their monthly report showing an "improvement in local visibility" but honestly, my phone isn't exactly ringing off the hook with local clients.

The real kicker? Just had coffee with another immigration attorney who told me they stopped doing SEO altogether because "Google's local algorithm doesn't favor niche practices anymore."

Anyone else feeling like local SEO might be turning into just another expense that worked in 2020 but isn't cutting it anymore? Especially curious to hear from other specialized practice attorneys - are you still seeing results from local SEO?

Running an LSAT prep business here. Got rocked by LSAC's announcement, logic games got replaced by a second logical reasoning section in August, 2024.

Funny thing, this whole mess taught me something about SEO. Was spending big on "LSAT prep near me" rankings. Meanwhile, students were literally just searching "LSAT logic games practice questions" at 3AM. Nothing fancy, nothing local. Just straight to what they needed.

Same thing could be with your immigration clients, probably. They're not searching "lawyer near me" - they want specific answers about their unique situations.

Check HOW your best clients found you. It might just not be local search.

@LawSEOPro & @MarketingMike - this is actually eye-opening. Just pulled up our client intake data from last 3 months...

You're right. Most of our clients aren't finding us through "immigration lawyer + city." They're searching stuff like "H1B denial appeal deadline" or "marriage green card process time 2025." And a huge chunk is in Mandarin and Spanish.

We've been pushing our agency to focus on local rankings while our actual clients are searching for completely different things. No wonder the ROI feels off.

@MarketingMike - appreciate that LSAT example. Sometimes the simplest answer (like your students just searching "LSAT logic games practice questions") makes the most sense. Maybe we're overthinking this whole local SEO thing.

Think I need to have a serious talk with our agency about redirecting our budget towards content that actually matches how our clients search...

Quick question for anyone who's made this pivot - did you completely abandon local SEO or just make it a smaller part of your strategy?